Skip to content
  • Forum
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. Latest News
  4. RFK Jr. Says 14 Peptides Are Returning to Legal Compounding — Here's What's Real

RFK Jr. Says 14 Peptides Are Returning to Legal Compounding — Here's What's Real

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Latest News
9 Posts 9 Posters 84 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    tess_swims
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Big news dropped on February 27, 2026 — RFK Jr. went on Joe Rogan and said roughly 14 of the 19 peptides the FDA restricted back in 2023 are being moved back to Category 1 status. That would mean licensed compounding pharmacies can prepare them again under a physician's prescription.

    The 14 reportedly coming back include BPC-157, TB-500, Thymosin Alpha-1, CJC-1295, Ipamorelin, AOD-9604, Selank, Semax, KPV, MOTS-C, GHK-Cu, and a few others.

    The 5 that are staying restricted: Melanotan II, GHRP-2, GHRP-6, LL-37, and PEG-MGF.

    Now here's where I want to pump the brakes a little, because I'm seeing a lot of people misread what this actually means right now.

    No formal FDA rule has been published yet. The PCAC review meeting is scheduled for July 23–24, 2026 — that's when formal implementation is supposed to move forward. So legally, we're still in a transitional gray zone until that happens. None of these compounds have FDA approval. A physician prescription is still required for any compounded version. And honestly, the quality verification piece matters more now than ever — unregulated sellers are already using RFK's statements as cover to push products with zero quality oversight.

    The direction is encouraging, but implementation is still pending. COA standards haven't changed just because someone made an announcement on a podcast.

    Curious where others are at with this — has this news shifted how you're thinking about your research planning, or are you holding off until the formal rule actually gets published?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Offline
      C Offline
      chris72
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Honestly, he's just not the right person to be making calls like this.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Offline
        T Offline
        trevor51
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        It's wild that someone with zero relevant background or qualifications can end up in a position that literally requires deep analytical and scientific knowledge — that's a pretty glaring gap in the system. There really should be stronger requirements that disqualify people who lack the foundational education for roles like this. This whole situation just exposes how loose the entry criteria are, and honestly it's scary to think it could happen again with someone even less qualified down the road.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          NicoleK
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          It's genuinely hard to wrap your head around how we got here — feels like the whole system got flipped upside down and everyone's just supposed to act like it's normal.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Offline
            B Offline
            boldmoose96
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Honestly the joke's on everyone making a big deal out of this — some of us have been sourcing from underground labs this whole time and never stopped.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Offline
              C Offline
              calm_elk
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Honestly, Bill Cassidy voting to confirm him is something I'll never understand — you'd think a physician senator would know better, and that vote should absolutely follow him for the rest of his career.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B Offline
                B Offline
                BeccaM
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                The HHS Secretary doesn't actually have the unilateral authority to just ban or unban things on their own like that.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Offline
                  C Offline
                  coastal_fox
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Honestly, I'd love to see him shift some of that energy toward figuring out why ALS rates seem to be climbing instead of fixating on the things he usually goes after.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Offline
                    B Offline
                    becca35
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    If you're looking for a good breakdown on peptides, Science Vs did an episode covering them that's worth a listen!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0

                    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                    Register Login
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Forum
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups